This website is intended for healthcare professionals only.

Hospital Healthcare Europe
Hospital Healthcare Europe

Press Releases

Take a look at a selection of our recent media coverage:

Psoriasis patients self-report higher analgesic usage largely due to joint pain

17th March 2022

Psoriasis patients self-report a greater use of analgesics than the general public largely because of increased joint pain

Psoriasis patients report using more analgesics than members of the general public without the disease and this is largely because of an increased level of joint pain. This was the finding of a study by researchers from the Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospitale-Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Psoriasis is best defined as a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory disease and which varies in prevalence around the world ranging from 30.3 per 100 000 person years to 321.0 per 100 000 person years. Although psoriasis presents clinically as an inflammatory skin condition, it has become recognised that 1 in 4 patients with psoriasis also have an associated and painful inflammatory joint condition, termed psoriatic arthritis. While the dry, flaky skin elevated psoriatic plaques are often highly pruritic, over recent years, it has become more apparent that skin pain is a frequently reported and bothersome symptom among people with psoriasis. Indeed, one retrospective analysis of over 4,500 psoriasis patients clearly showed how patients experience pain, finding that two-thirds were co-prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 59.5% other analgesics and 45.9% opioids.

What remains unclear however, is why people with psoriasis take analgesics and so for the present study, the Danish team turned to data contained within the Danish Skin Cohort to assess disease burden and the use of analgesics among psoriasis patients with and without psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and for comparative purposes, included a control group without either condition.

Psoriasis patients and use of analgesics

A total of 3169 patients with psoriasis only and a mean age of 59 years (55.8% female) were included along side, 3490 controls and 847 individuals with both psoriasis and PsA.

The median skin and joint pain in the general population was 0 and 2 respectively. In contrast, moderate-to-severe skin pain was reported by 30% of those with PsA and 21% with psoriasis alone (p < 0.0001). In addition, moderate-to-severe joint pain was reported by 69% of those with PsA and 45% of those with only psoriasis (p < 0.0001).

The use of opioid analgesics in the last 12 months was reported by 9% of the control group, 14.2% of those with psoriasis alone but 22.7% of those with both psoriasis and PsA. Using multivariable regression, the authors calculated that only joint pain was significantly associated with the use of analgesics (odds ratio, OR = 3.72, 95% CI 2.69 – 5.14, p < 0.001).

The authors concluded that physicians should pay increased attention to those with psoriasis who report any joint pain in order to further improve their clinical management.

Loft N et al. Disease burden, symptoms, and use of analgesics in patients with psoriasis with or without psoriatic arthritis: A cross-sectional study J Am Acad Dermatol 2022

NICE approves Cosentyx for children and young people with psoriasis

7th September 2021

The biologic Cosentyx (secukinumab) has been approved by NICE for the management of children and young people with plaque psoriasis.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has approved the use of the monoclonal antibody Cosentyx (secukinumab) as an option for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in children and young people aged 6 to 17 years of age. It is only recommended where the psoriasis area and severity index (PASI), which is a measure of disease severity, is greater than 10 (meaning moderate to severe disease) and where other systemic therapies have been unsuccessful. The systemic therapies mentioned in the guidance are ciclosporin, methotrexate, as well as phototherapy, although Cosentyx can also be used in cases where any of these treatments are contra-indicated. In addition, NICE has recommended use of Cosentyx only where the manufacturer provides the drug in line with an agreed commercial arrangement.

The outcome of interest when using Cosentyx is the achievement of a PASI75, i.e., a 75% improvement in disease severity, after 12 weeks of treatment. If such an improvement has not occurred, then NICE recommends stopping Cosentyx. A further point in the guideline is that where a clinician considers that secukinumab is the most appropriate therapy, the least expensive option should be used and it has been increasing recognised that there are huge potential and achievable savings for the NHS through the use of biosimilars,

In making its decision, NICE received information on the comparative clinical efficacy of other biologics used in psoriasis including etanercept, adalimumab and ustekinumab. The committee noted from studies that secukinumab was more effective than etanercept, based on a higher proportion of participants achieving a PASI75 and that the efficacy was comparable with ustekinumab. Although there were no direct comparisons of Cosentyx with adalimumab in the paediatric population, a network meta-analysis submitted by the manufacturer, showed that adalimumab was as effective as ustekinumab. Furthermore, there were no differences in safety outcomes for Cosentyx compared with other similar biologics.

Source. NICE 2021

EU approves bimekizumab for moderate to severe psoriasis

24th August 2021

Bimekizumab is the first agent that inhibits the two cytokines IL-17A and 1L-17F which are both involved in the development of psoriasis.

Psoriasis is best described as a complex, chronic, multifactorial and inflammatory disease characterised by increased proliferation of keratinocyte cells in the skin giving rise to silvery/white plaques. The disease typically presents on extensor surfaces such as the elbows, knees and lower back and there if often involvement of the scalp. The incidence of psoriasis appears to vary across the world, with a recent study noting a wide variation. For instance, the incidence was 30.3 per 100,000 person years in Taiwan but 321 per 100,000 person years in Italy. Among those with psoriasis, one study of over 9,000 patients, found that just over half (51.8%) had mild disease, with 35.8% and 12.4% having moderate and severe disease respectively. Patients with mild to moderate disease are normally managed with topical therapies, whereas those with moderate to severe disease are increasing treated with biological agents, in particular, monoclonal antibodies. Although the precise cause of psoriasis remains to be determined, several interleukins appear to be important disease drivers, especially the interleukin-17 (IL-17) pathway which includes six similar agents, IL-17A – IL-17F. Research suggests that two members of the IL-17 family, IL-17A and IL-17F are implicated in autoimmunity and IL17F appears to regulate pro-inflammatory gene expression and which requires the IL-17A receptor, suggesting that both are involved in the pathology of psoriasis. Bimekizumab is the first monoclonal antibody which selectively inhibits both IL-17A and IL-17F and is therefore a potentially important advancement in the management of patients with moderate to severe psoriasis.

Clinical efficacy
The EU approval of bimekizumab was supported by the results of three phase 3 clinical trials, all undertaken in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. The first, BE READY, randomised 435 patients (4:1) to bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks or placebo. The co-primary endpoint was a PASI90 (i.e., 90% improvement in disease severity compared to baseline) and the proportion of patients achieving a score of 0 (i.e., clear skin) or 1 (almost clear), based on a 5-point investigator global assessment (IGA) score after 16 weeks of treatment. The results showed that a staggering 91% of those assigned to bimekizumab achieved a PASI90 compared to only 1% in the placebo group. In the BE VIVID trial, 567 patients were randomised to bimekizumab (at the same dosage as the BE READY trial) or this time, ustekinumab 45 or 90 mg every 12 weeks and which is an active comparator or placebo. Once again at week 16 there was a high response in the bimekizumab group with 85% achieving a PASI90 compared to 50% in the ustekinumab. The third trial, BE SURE, enrolled 478 patients who were randomised to either bimekizumab (same dosage as in the other trials) or adalimumab (another active comparator) at a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks. At week 16, a PASI90 was achieved 85.3% of those using bimekizumab and 57.2% of those given adalimumab.
The most common adverse effects from bimekizumab are upper respiratory tract infections (14.5%) and patients are advised to seek medical advice if they display symptoms suggestive of an infection.
The EU approval applies to all 27 member states as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway at a dose of 320 mg administered by subcutaneous injections every 4 weeks for week 16 and every 8 weeks thereafter. The drug is currently under review by the US Food and Drug administration.

Source: UCB press release 2021

Cosentyx receives FDA approval for use in children and adolescents

11th June 2021

Manufacturer Novartis has been granted approval for Cosentyx (secukinumab) use in children from 6 years of age with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory conditions that affects 1% of children and adolescents in the US. Moreover, due to the visible nature of the condition, psoriasis can have a negative impact on children’s quality of life.

The interleukin-17A (IL-17A) inhibitor, secukinumab (brand name Cosentyx) can now be used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis in children from the age of six who are candidates for systemic or phototherapy because of the severity of their psoriasis. The drug has more than 14 years of clinical experience and long-term, 5-year clinical data. The approved dosing is 75 or 150mg, depending on the child’s weight (i.e., 75mg for those < 50kg and 150mg > 50kg) and the drug is administered by subcutaneous injection every four weeks after an initial loading regime. A further advantage is that after suitable counselling, the dose can be given by an adult carer, hence avoiding the need to visit a healthcare professional.

The approval of Cosentyx was based on the results of two Phase III trials that were undertaken in children aged between 6 and 18 years. The first trial was a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study with 162 children with severe plaque psoriasis. The study had a co-primary endpoint: the proportion achieving a psoriasis area severity index (PASI) 75 score (i.e., a 75% improvement in disease severity) and an investigator’s global assessment of either “clear” (no psoriasis) or “almost clear” at week 12.

Among children <50kg, after 12 weeks, 55% vs 10% (Cosentyx vs placebo) had achieved a PASI 75. Similarly in those weighing >50kg, the corresponding PASI 75 values were 86% vs 19% (Cosentyx vs placebo). For children weighing <50kg, the proportion achieving a score of clear or almost clear was 32% vs 5% (Cosentyx vs placebo). Similarly, among children weighing > 50kg, the corresponding values were 81% vs 5%.

The second trial was designed to assess safety although the press release contains no data from this study and at present, neither study has been published.

Discussing the new approval, Randy Beranek, President and CEO of the National Psoriasis Foundation, said “Having expanded treatment options for this patient population is a step in the right direction to help reduce the burden of plaque psoriasis“.

Real-world data show that biologics for psoriasis are less effective in practice

7th December 2020

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) define the expected efficacy of a drug. However, real-world studies serve to demonstrate the effectiveness in clinical practice, which might be very different.

Real-world data can be derived from patient registries and are of value because they illustrate whether the expected efficacy determined in a randomised trial holds up in practice. Using information held in the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators Register (BADBIR), a team from the Centre for Dermatology, Salford, UK, examined the comparative effectiveness of two biologics, secukinumab and ustekinumab used in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis, defined in terms of a psoriasis and area severity index (PASI) of 12 or more prior to starting with either biologic. The PASI serves as a measure of disease severity with scores above 10, indicating at least moderate disease severity. The researchers restricted the drug initiation dates to on or after September 2013 (when both drugs became available) and before September 2018, to allow for patients to have completed at least 12 months of therapy. The primary outcome for the study was the difference in the proportion of patients who achieved a PASI of 2 or lower (i.e. virtually disease free) after 12 months of therapy. The authors used the results of a recent RCT in which the two biologics were studied head-to-head, as a baseline to compare the effectiveness data derived from the BADBIR registry.

A total of 1231 patients were included, 917 receiving ustekinumab (mean age 45 years, 40% female) and the remainder secukinumab (mean age 46 with 38% female). A PASI at 12 months post-treatment was available for only 42% and 45.5% of those given secukinumab and ustekinumab respectively. Secukinumab was superior to ustekinumab in achieving a PASI of 2 (relative risk = 1.28, 95% CI 1.06 – 1.55). However, a further and important finding from the BADBIR registry data was that the estimate of efficacy from the RCT appeared much lower in practice. For example, secukinumab and ustekinumab were 17.5% and 15.1% less effective than the RCT data would suggest.

Commenting on these findings, the authors suggested that given this discrepancy, clinicians should aim to inform patients prescribed either drug that the true effectiveness was likely to be lower than expected based on the results shown in the clinical trial.

You ZZN et al. Randomised trial replication using observational data for comparative effectiveness of secukinumab and ustekinumab in psoriasis. A study from the British Association of Dermatologists Biologics and Immunomodulators register. JAMA Dermatol 2020