This website is intended for healthcare professionals only.

Hospital Healthcare Europe
Hospital Pharmacy Europe     Newsletter    Login            

TECFIDERA® data highlights benefit of early treatment in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Biogen present new TECFIDERA (dimethyl fumarate) research at the 68th annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) in Vancouver, Canada. The data presented supports the value of dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and provides additional information supporting the efficacy and safety profile, as well as real-world patient-reported outcomes.1,2,3,4

More than half of patients free from disease activity over six years
Clinical disease activity-free status was defined as no relapse, and no 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP). The data presented reports clinical experience with dimethyl fumarate across two groups; those continuously treated with dimethyl fumarate throughout a six-year period, and those who were initially treated with placebo for two years, before switching to dimethyl fumarate for the remaining four years.1

This post-hoc analysis shows that, of patients continuously treated with dimethyl fumarate, 65% did not experience a relapse over the six year period (versus 57% in the switch group), and 87% remained free of disability progression (versus 79% in the switch group), suggesting that early treatment may be beneficial to support improved patient outcomes.1       

Annualised relapse rates (ARR) at year six were 0.14 (0.10–0.19) in the dimethyl fumarate group, and 0.17 (0.11–0.25) in the switch group, representing a 19% relative risk reduction (p=0.3988) with continuous treatment. Those in the switch group demonstrated improvements after switching to dimethyl fumarate treatment, moving from an ARR of 0.26 (0.18–0.37) in years 0–2 to 0.10 (0.06–0.16) in years 3–6, representing a 61% relative risk reduction (p<0.0001).1

Article continues below this sponsored advert
Cogora InRead Image
Join us at a one-day virtual cardiology event that will allow you to explore the latest advances in cardiovascular care. With the help of an advisory board of cardiology specialists we have put together an agenda tailored to multi-disciplinary teams - each talk is presented by an expert, or panel, who will share knowledge and case studies of relevance

24-week CDP at year six was 15.7% (10.3–23.7) in the dimethyl fumarate group, and 24.3% (15.9–36.2) in the switch group, representing a 49% relative risk reduction (p=.0397), which demonstrates the benefit of earlier treatment with respect to the risk of 24-week CDP. The overall event rate of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) progression remained low for patients in the study (median EDSS score at the end of six years was 2.0, which is the same as at baseline).1
Dimethyl fumarate demonstrates improved outcomes compared to other MS therapies

Additional research presented at the AAN congress, collected from a United States health insurance database, demonstrates the efficacy of dimethyl fumarate, interferon ?, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide and fingolimod. In a retrospective, real-world study of more than 5000 patients, dimethyl fumarate was associated with a greater decrease in unadjusted ARR after one year of treatment (0.43 in the year prior vs. 0.29 in the year after, p<.0001) than glatiramer acetate (0.28 vs. 0.31), interferon beta (0.37 versus 0.34), teriflunomide (0.41 versus 0.37). ARR one year after initiation was comparable with fingolimod (0.45 versus 0.33, p=0.0016). After adjusting the incidence rate ratio (IRR) for baseline patient demographics, clinical characteristics and prior disease-modifying therapy exposure, dimethyl fumarate was also associated with significantly lower ARR than glatiramer acetate (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.48), interferon ? (IRR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08–1.45) and teriflunomide (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08–1.53). No significant difference was found between the dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod cohorts (IRR 1.12, 95% CI 0.94–1.33).4

In an additional study presented, dimethyl fumarate demonstrated significantly lower ARR and improved patient-reported outcomes after suboptimal response to glatiramer acetate. After six months of treatment with dimethyl fumarate, the unadjusted ARR was 0.13, compared to 0.40 in the 12 months prior to dimethyl fumarate initiation (rate ratiob (95% CI): 0.33 (0.20–0.53, p<.0001).2

The MS treatment landscape has expanded rapidly in recent years, giving healthcare professionals and patients options for various stages of disease. Beyond clinical findings, real-world data provide important insights into patients’ experiences outside of clinical trials,” said Kate Dawson, MD, vice president, US Medical. “These data show that dimethyl fumarate consistently delivers sustained efficacy in newly diagnosed patients both in a real-world and clinical setting, further supporting the value it offers patients and affirming the advantages of early treatment with dimethyl fumarate in decreasing clinical disease activity.

Additional data supports long-term, well-characterised safety profile
In an effort to better understand the overall safety profile of dimethyl fumarate, data presented at AAN explore the treatment’s effects on lymphocyte profiles. The data demonstrates that treatment with dimethyl fumarate resulted in decreased lymphocyte counts across all age groups. Overall, the pattern of lymphocyte decline is generally similar across age groups and consistent with that seen in the overall population. However, it appears that older age is associated with a slightly greater decline in absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) from baseline, and a higher incidence of severe lymphopenia (ALC <0.5 x 109/L persisting for ≥6 months). All age groups have a small risk for developing prolonged moderate to severe lymphopenia, which is a risk factor for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). The data reinforce the importance of ALC monitoring, in line with the guidance provided in the product information, and remain consistent with the overall favourable benefit-risk profile of dimethyl fumarate.3


  1. Gold et al. Longer-term follow-up of the efficacy of delayed-release dimethyl fumurate in newly diagnosed patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: Intergrated analysis of DEFINE, CONFIRM, and ENDORSE, P3.033. The 68th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), Vancouver, Canada, 15-21 April 2016. Accessed April 2016.
  2. Kresa-Reahl et al. Clinical effectiveness and impact on patient-reported outcomes of delayed-release dimethyl fumurate in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients after suboptimal response to glatirmar acetate: 6-month interim analysis of a prospective, multicentre, open-label, single-arm, observational study (RESPOND), P6.172. The 68th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), Vancouver, Canada, 15-21 April 2016. Accessed April 2016.
  3. Fox et al. Characterisation of absolute lymphocyte count profiles in MS patients treated with delayed-release dimethyl fumurate: considerations for patient management, P2.099. The 68th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), Vancouver, Canada, 15-21 April 2016. Accessed April 2016.
  4. Boster et al. Comparative effectiveness research of disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis – findings from a large health insurance claims database, P3.116. The 68th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN), Vancouver, Canada, 15-21 April 2016. Accessed April 2016.