Optimising physical health in individuals with severe mental illness and the role of pharmacy

People with severe mental illness die about 10–20 years earlier than the general population, mainly due to physical health disease. Evidence about the role of the pharmacist and pharmacy in optimising care in this vulnerable patient population is provided in this article

People with severe mental illness (SMI), defined here as bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and other non-organic psychotic disorders, are at a substantially higher risk of premature death, in that they die 10–20 years earlier than the general population.^1,2 SMI represents a leading cause of the global burden of disease with high morbidity rates and an estimated excess mortality of 1.5–3-times higher than the general population.³ While unnatural causes, including suicide, homicide and accidents explain some of this reduced life expectancy,⁴ it is now firmly established that physical health diseases account for the overwhelming majority of premature deaths.⁵ 

Mortality gap and associated factors

The mortality gap exists in countries considered to have high standards of healthcare^6–10 and there is also evidence that the mortality gap has increased over time.^11,12 This appears to indicate that individuals with SMI have not experienced the same benefits from developments in healthcare as the general population.¹² The premature and excess morbidity and mortality in people with SMI has ramifications not only for mental health and all health services but also for human rights and equity. A situation that has been labelled a scandal and in contravention of international conventions for the ‘right to health’.¹³

Among physical health diseases, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes are the main potentially avoidable contributors to early death in people with SMI.⁵ In a comprehensive meta-analysis of CVD risk in individuals with SMI, which included 3,211,768 patients and 113,383,368 controls, individuals with SMI had a statistically significant increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) compared to controls; a 54% higher risk in longitudinal studies and 51% higher risk in cross-sectional studies.¹⁴ Studies have reported that among patients diagnosed with diabetes, those with SMI have 50% higher mortality¹⁵ and an increased risk of complications requiring specialist treatment¹⁶ compared to people without SMI. These findings are well substantiated by multiple meta-analyses and systematic reviews. 

People with SMI have a higher relative risk (1–5-fold) for modifiable cardiometabolic factors. The prevalence of hyperglycaemia, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and hyperlipidaemia in those with SMI has been reported to be 19%, 33.2%, approximately 48% and 61%, respectively.^17–19 

Public health data from the UK and the US suggest that around two-thirds of people with SMI are current smokers, approximately double that of the general population.^20,21 Literature reviews indicate that people with SMI are 2–3-times more likely than the general population to be overweight or obese.^22,23 This might be related to a poor diet as reported in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 58 studies.²⁴ 

Furthermore, metabolic syndrome (MetS) is one of the most prevalent risk factors for developing CVD in those with SMI.^25,26 Thirty-seven per cent of those with chronic schizophrenia have MetS compared with 24% in the general population.²⁷ 

The World Health Organization (WHO) considers the premature and excess morbidity and mortality in individuals with SMI a public health priority and it is included within the WHO’s Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan.²⁸ 

A poor quality of care

Worldwide studies demonstrate that it is now well established that people with SMI receive a poor quality of care for their physical health when compared to the general population, from health promotion and disease prevention and screening through to interventions.^29–32 Despite having twice as many contacts with healthcare services, individuals with SMI receive less physical health screening, fewer prescriptions and fewer procedures,^33,34 and lower rates of CVD diagnosis even though, as outlined earlier, the risk of these patients dying from CVD is higher.^33,35,36 Specific examples include lower rates of surgical procedures such as coronary artery bypass and revascularisation and fewer prescriptions for cardiovascular medication.^34,36 

The mainstay of treatment for most people with SMI is antipsychotic medication. Antipsychotics are associated with an increased prevalence of CMR, MetS and related diseases including dyslipidaemia, impaired glucose tolerance and weight gain;^37,38 the greatest weight gain has been reported to occur during the first few months of use.^37,39,40 

Marked differences exist in the incidence associated with different antipsychotic medication, the (so-called) second generation olanzapine and clozapine being associated with the highest incidence and aripiprazole, lurasidone amongst others associated with the lowest.^41,42 Large-scale observational studies indicate that all-cause mortality is reduced when continuous long-term antipsychotic use is maintained, this is attributed to reduced relapse rates, healthier lifestyles, less psychosis-related cortisol increases, and increased engagement with health services.^35,43,44 Judicious prescribing can reduce excess mortality in individuals with SMI. Recent studies and evidence summaries highlight the positive impact on mortality of continuous treatment), appropriate dose ranges, and current and long-term use.

High rates of lifestyle behaviours such as smoking exist but studies clearly and consistently demonstrate that contributory factors to morbidity and mortality extend beyond diagnosis, medication and lifestyle behaviours.^1,29 For example, despite the wealth of evidence that a large majority die of CVD, only one quarter receive a diagnosis for this.³⁵ After controlling for whether a diagnosis has been made, the risk of death due to ischaemic heart disease equates almost equal to that of someone in the general population.³⁵ 

A comprehensive approach is needed to improve the health and longevity of people with SMI; the greatest benefits could be achieved using a multifaceted approach which tackles individual, health system and socioeconomic factors to simultaneously address individual behaviour, health system and social factors.^1,29 

Addressing excess morbidity and mortality

Guidelines have been developed and disseminated to address this excess morbidity and mortality. These primarily target mental health, lifestyle behavioural risk factors, and screening and management for physical health. As far back as 1995, elements of physical healthcare including CMR, MetS and related diseases were incorporated into government guidelines for SMI in parts of Australia.⁴⁵ In the UK, guidelines for schizophrenia were first published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in 2002⁴⁶ and included recommendations for regular physical health screening. Then, in 2004, as a result of a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warning about the association of antipsychotics with an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes, the American Diabetes Association and the American Psychiatry Association published joint guidelines explicitly outlining the need for routine screening for diabetes for people taking antipsychotics.⁴⁷ 

↓Article continues below this sponsored advert↓

Explore the latest advances in respiratory care at events delivered by renowned experts from CofE

AboutTickets

↑Advertisement↑

Up-to-date versions of these guidelines recommend coordination among mental health and primary care providers, and delivery of general physical health services in mental health settings.^37,48–51 Manufacturers of antipsychotics include clear statements about screening and management for CMR, MetS and related diseases in their Summary of Product Characteristics; the prescription of such medication should be in line with this legal document. 

Despite the convincing evidence for the association of antipsychotic use and CMR, MetS and related diseases in people with SMI and explicit recommendations provided by guidelines, screening is often incomplete or inconsistent.⁵²

A review carried out in 2012 of 39 internationally published studies reported that rates of routine baseline screening were low (50% solely for blood pressure and 59.9% for triglycerides), less than 50% for cholesterol (41.5%), glucose (44.3%), weight (47.9%) and HbA1c (<25%).⁵² A review conducted in 2016 suggested that interventions to improve screening for obesity, hyperlipidaemia and hypertension can be effective at improving the detection of CMR, MetS and related diseases. 

Delivering parity between mental and physical health

The Health and Social Care Act 2012 (UK) set out a clear and explicitly legal responsibility for the National Health System (NHS) to deliver parity between mental and physical health. Further, secondary care psychiatric/mental health NHS trusts were given financial incentives to work towards meeting indicators under a Commissioning for Quality and Innovation Scheme (CQUIN). This included carrying out and recording screening and management for CMR, MetS and related diseases for people with SMI. Significantly, the scheme mandated communication with the patient’s general practitioner on discharge from secondary care. In the USA, a proposition was put forward that individuals with SMI be considered a health disparity group by the federal government.⁵³ This included a requirement to track health statistics of this population and to provide more opportunities supporting these patients with their health.⁵³ 

Individuals with SMI represent a vulnerable group with multiple and substantial healthcare needs. The excess morbidity and mortality in individuals with SMI continue to be an important global public health problem. The excess morbidity and mortality in this population are mainly due to preventable physical health illnesses related to CMR, MetS and related diseases. Despite identified and established risk factors for morbidity and premature mortality, evidence for effective interventions for CMR, MetS and related diseases in people with SMI is limited. Pharmacy is increasingly being highlighted as a profession that has the potential to contribute to comorbid physical and mental healthcare in both primary and secondary care settings. However, robust high-quality research supporting the role of pharmacy providing care for CMR, MetS and related diseases in individuals with SMI is lacking.

The role of pharmacy 

A literature review explored the use of pharmacy in the management of CMR, MetS and related diseases in SMI.⁵⁴ An important focus of this review was to explore implementation strategies to improve physical health screening, such as HbA1c for diabetes, and related interventions such as smoking cessation or reduction. This review reported that face-to-face interactions of pharmacists with others, such as patients or healthcare professionals, is a specific aspect that is important in achieving a statistically significant impact on health screening and related interventions. This might be, for example, a pharmacist-led multidisciplinary ward round or pharmacist outreach visits. 

This literature review identified gaps in the current evidence base. This included, for example, screening of waist circumference and weight/weight change, cardiovascular and diabetes risk assessment using formal risk assessment tools/calculators or high-dose antipsychotic or polypharmacy with antipsychotics. Currently, guidance within the UK recommends the use of QRISK^® to assess the risk of CVD in people with schizophrenia.^55,66 Also lacking were studies involving pharmacy technicians in any patient facing roles.

A lack of data was found about the role/involvement of community pharmacy or pharmacy professionals other than pharmacists (i.e., pharmacy technicians) within primary care, follow up of individuals after implementation of a study intervention, utilisation of behaviour change, or self-management techniques community or family support.⁵⁴ 

Also absent from the data was an in-depth exploration of the views, perceptions, or experiences of patients, (their) informal carers or caring dyads, pharmacy and care professionals where formal qualitative data synthesis had been undertaken. This is critical as it might inform the acceptability of service developments. Furthermore, such evidence would be central in establishing an agreed set of standards to assess and understand patients’ experiences of care in in facilitating and identifying those things that matter the most to patients. To address this specific gap, a PhD study was undertaken and completed in 2021.⁵⁷ 

The PhD study reported many areas of unmet need. In particular, patients’ experiences of a lack of in depth, significant and meaningful interactions with pharmacists. Furthermore, patients have a desire for information exchange about CMR, MetS and related diseases as side effects of medication, rather than being informed and/or just simply being provided with a leaflet. A key step for pharmacy practice to impact on this is to increase pharmacist–patient facing interactions to facilitate the formation of long-lasting trusting relationships. 

A starting point for this could be to build these practices into routine interactions, for example when a patient collects medication from the community pharmacy. In the long-term, increased frequency and depth of interactions can only be facilitated by appropriate resourcing of pharmacists to do this. Evidence from this study suggests that such a change will require not only increased numbers of pharmacists but also a change in working practices. 

Changes in ways of working should incorporate the aspects of social, cultural, policy and healthcare organisational structures documented in this study. These challenges are created by medical hierarchies and the power dynamics and imbalances, labour divisions and boundaries of responsibility between care professions that compromise interdisciplinary working. Ultimately, this would encourage person-centred care with the aim of building trusting relationships, which is key in this vulnerable population.

Learning points

• People with severe mental illness (SMI) such as bipolar affective disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and other non-organic psychotic disorders, are at a substantially higher risk of premature death, in that they die 10–20 years earlier than the general population. 
• Many factors contribute to this excess mortality; people with SMI receive a poor quality of care for their physical health when compared to the general population. Despite having twice as many contacts with healthcare services, individuals with SMI receive less physical health screening, fewer prescriptions for cardiovascular medication such as beta-blockers and statins and fewer procedures and lower rates of cardiovascular disease diagnosis.
• The mainstay of treatment for most people with SMI is antipsychotic medication. Judicious prescribing can reduce excess mortality in individuals with SMI, and recent studies and evidence summaries highlight the positive impact on mortality of continuous treatment), appropriate dose ranges, and current and long-term use.
• Pharmacy is increasingly being highlighted as a profession that has the potential to contribute to comorbid physical and mental healthcare in both primary and secondary care settings. 
• Exploration of the views, experiences and perspectives of patients and informal carers indicates unmet need in the care they receive including lack of in depth, significant and meaningful interactions with pharmacists, lack of information exchange about CMR, MetS and related diseases as side effects of medication. The first step for pharmacy practice to impact on this is to increase pharmacist–patient facing interactions to facilitate the formation of long-lasting trusting relationships.

References 

1. Liu NH et al. Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: a multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas. World Psychiatry 2017;16(1):30–40. 
2. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of physical health conditions in adults with severe mental disorders. Geneva; 2018. 
3. Walker ER, McGee RE, Druss BG. Mortality in mental disorders and global disease burden implications a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry 2015;72(4):334–41. 
4. Popovic D et al. Risk factors for suicide in schizophrenia: Systematic review and clinical recommendations. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2014;130(6):418–26. 
5. Hoang U, Goldacre MJ, Stewart R. Avoidable mortality in people with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder in England. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2013;127(3):195–201. 
6. Joukamaa M et al. Schizophrenia, neuroleptic medication and mortality. Br J Psychiatry 2006;188:122–7. 
7. Ösby U et al. Mortality and causes of death in schizophrenia in Stockholm County, Sweden. Schizophr Res 2000;45(1–2):21–8. 
8. Colombo M. Reflexivity and narratives in action research: A discursive approach [Internet]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 2003. www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/718 (accessed July 2022).
9. Fors BM, Isacson D, Bingefors K, Widerlöv B. Mortality among persons with schizophrenia in Sweden: An epidemiological study. Nord J Psychiatry 2007;61(4):252–9. 
10. Dag T et al. Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorder in Sweden: A cohort study of 12 103 individuals with and without contact with psychiatric services. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2008;4(23). 
11. Lawrence D, Kisely S, Pais J. The epidemiology of excess mortality in people with mental illness. Can J Psychiatry 2010;55(12):752–60. 
12. Saha S, Chant D, McGrath J. A systematic review of mortality in schizophrenia: Is the differential mortality gap worsening over time? Arch Gen Psychiatry 2007;64(10):1123–31. 
13. Koschorke M et al. Experiences of stigma and discrimination faced by family caregivers of people with schizophrenia in India. Soc Sci Med 2017;178:66–77. 
14. Correll CU et al. Prevalence, incidence and mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with pooled and specific severe mental illness: a large-scale meta-analysis of 3,211,768 patients and 113,383,368 controls. World Psychiatry 2017;16(2):163–80. 
15. Vinogradova Y et al. Effects of severe mental illness on survival of people with diabetes. Br J Psychiatry 2010;197(4):272–7. 
16. Becker T, Hux J. Risk of acute complications of diabetes among people with schizophrenia in Ontario, Canada. Diabetes Care 2011;34(2):398–402. 
17. Mitchell AJ et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome and metabolic abnormalities in schizophrenia and related disorders-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Bull 2013;39(2):306–18. 
18. Nasrallah HA et al. Low rates of treatment for hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes in schizophrenia: data from the CATIE schizophrenia trial sample at baseline. Schizophr Res 2006;86(1–3):15–22. 
19. Pérez-Piñar M et al. Cardiovascular risk factors among patients with schizophrenia, bipolar, depressive, anxiety, and personality disorders. Eur Psychiatry 2016;35:8–15. 
20. The Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC). Statistics on smoking: Smoking rates in people with serious mental illness: England, 2016. www.digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/clinical-indicators/ccg-outcomes-indicator-set/archive/ccg-outcomes-indicator-set—march-2016 (accessed July 2022).
21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Best Practices User Guide: Health Equity in Tobacco Prevention and Control [Internet]. 2015. www.cdc.gov/tobacco/stateandcommunity/best-practices-health-equity/pdfs/ (accessed July 2022).
22. Holt R, Peveler R. Obesity, serious mental illness and antipsychotic drugs. Diabetes Obes Metab 2009;11(7):665–79. 
23. Allison D et al. Obesity among those with mental disorders: a National Institute of Mental Health meeting report. Am J Prev Med 2009;36(4):341–50. 
24. Teasdale SB et al. Dietary intake of people with severe mental illness: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2019;214(5):251–9. 
25. Angst F et al. Mortality of patients with mood disorders: follow-up over 34-38 years. J Affect Disord 2002 Apr 1;68(2–3):167–81. 
26. Casey D. Metabolic issues and cardiovascular disease in patients with psychiatric disorders. Am J Med [Internet]. 2005;118(S2):15S-22S.
27. Heiskanen T et al. Metabolic syndrome in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2003;64(5):575–9. 
28. World Health Organization. Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2020. www.who.int/mental_health/action_plan_2013/en/ (accessed July 2022).
29. Dregan A et al. Potential gains in life expectancy from reducing amenable mortality among people diagnosed with serious mental illness in the United Kingdom. PLoS One 2020;15(3):e0230674. 
30. Lamontagne-Godwin F et al. Interventions to increase access to or uptake of physical health screening in people with severe mental illness: A realist review. BMJ Open 2018;8(2):e019412. 
31. De Hert M et al. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care. World Psychiatry 2011;10:52–77. 
32. De Hert M et al. Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. II. Barriers to care, monitoring and treatment guidelines, plus recommendations at the system and individual level. World Psychiatry 2011;10(2):138–51. 
33. Lawrence DM et al. Death rate from ischaemic heart disease in Western Australian psychiatric patients 1980-1998. Br J Psychiatry 2003;182:31–6. 
34. Kisely S, Campbell LA, Wang Y. Treatment of ischaemic heart disease and stroke in individuals with psychosis under universal healthcare. Br J Psychiatry 2009;195(6):545–50. 
35. Crump C et al. Comorbidities and mortality in persons with schizophrenia: A Swedish national cohort study. Am J Psychiatry 2013;170(3):324–33. 
36. Laursen TM et al. Somatic hospital contacts, invasive cardiac procedures, and mortality from heart disease in patients with severe mental disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66(7):713–20. 
37. Cooper SJ et al. BAP guidelines on the management of weight gain, metabolic disturbances and cardiovascular risk associated with psychosis and antipsychotic drug treatment. J Psychopharmacol 2016;30(8):717–48. 
38. Leucht S et al. Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2009;373(9657):31–41. 
39. Jones B et al. Weight change and atypical antipsychotic treatment in patients with schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry 2001;62(S2):41–4. 
40. Kinon BJ et al. Association between early and rapid weight gain and change in weight over one year of olanzapine therapy in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2005;25(3):255–8. 
41. Basu A, Meltzer HY. Differential trends in prevalence of diabetes and unrelated general medical illness for schizophrenia patients before and after the atypical antipsychotic era. Schizophr Res 2006;86(1–3):99–109. 
42. Pillinger T et al. Comparative effects of 18 antipsychotics on metabolic function in patients with schizophrenia, predictors of metabolic dysregulation, and association with psychopathology: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2020;7(1):64–77. 
43. Tiihonen J et al. 11-year follow-up of mortality in patients with schizophrenia: a population-based cohort study (FIN11 study). Lancet 2009;374(9690):620–7. 
44. Taipale H et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Antipsychotics for Risk of Attempted or Completed Suicide Among Persons With Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 2021;47(1):23–30. 
45. Victorian Mental Health Services. Improved Access Through Co-Ordinated Client Care 94/0285. Melbourne; 1995. 
46. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Schizophrenia: Core Interventions in the Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Primary and Secondary Care. London; 2002. 
47. American Diabetes Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, and North American Association for the Study of Obesity. Consensus Development Conference on Antipsychotic Drugs and Obesity and Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(2):596–601. 
48.  Lambert TJR et al. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists expert consensus statement for the treatment, management and monitoring of the physical health of people with an enduring psychotic illness. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2017;51(4):322–37. 
49. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults. NICE guidelines on treament and management. 2014. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178/evidence/full-guideline-490503565 (accessed July 2022).
50. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults: prevention and management. Clinical guideline CG178. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg178 (accessed July 2022).
51. Buchanan R et al. The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychopharmacological treatment recommendations and summary statements. Schizophr Bull 2010;36(1):71–93. 
52. Mitchell A et al. Guideline concordant monitoring of metabolic risk in people treated with antipsychotic medication: systematic review and meta-analysis of screening practices. Psychol Med 2012;42(1):125–47. 
53. Druss BG, Bornemann TH. Improving health and health care for persons with serious mental illness: The window for US federal policy change. J Am Med Assoc 2010;303(19):1972–3. 
54. Sud D et al. The role of pharmacy in the management of cardiometabolic risk and metabolic syndrome in severe mental illness: a mixed methods review. BMC Syst Rev 2021;10(1):1–35. 
55. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Brindle P. QRISK risk calculator [Internet]. 2018. https://qrisk.org/ (accessed July 2022).
56. LESTER UK Adaptation 2014. Positive Cardiometabolic Health Resource. [Internet]. 2014. www.rcpsych.ac.uk/docs/default-source/improving-care/ccqi/national-clinical-audits/ncap-library/ncap-e-version-nice-endorsed-lester-uk-adaptation.pdf?sfvrsn=39bab4_2 (accessed July 2022).
57. Sud D. Cardiometabolic risk, metabolic syndrome and related diseases in severe mental illness: the role of pharmacy in the lived experience of patients [Internet]. Aston University; 2021. https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/43476/6/SUD_DOLLY_2021v2.pdf (accessed July 2022).

First published on our sister publication Hospital Pharmacy Europe